|
Innovative product and packaging development is the key to taking advantage of the growing pet market.
Weatherchem Corp.
|
|
Whatever packaging you can dream up, Printpack can make it happen! Printpack's Seal-it Division introduces Metallic Effects - new effect pigments and color shifting inks for shrink sleeve labels.
Printpack, Inc.
|
• find design inspiration from around the world • conduct a worldwide category audit for new design projects • inspect minute details with high-resolution imagery, multiple views • conveniently arranged by product category • new images uploaded daily
Global Package Gallery |
Shelf Impact! Advisory
Board
Eric Ashworth
Chief Strategic Officer
Anthem Worldwide
Laura Bix, PhD
Assistant Professor, School of Packaging
Michigan State University
Marie Curi
Brand Consultant
Curiousity, LLC
Dennis Furniss
Vice President, Strategic Branding
BrandScope
Robert Hall
Vice President of Brand Development
Boston Beer Co.
Michael Livolsi
Brand Identity and Packaging Design Consultant
Brian Wagner
Vice President and COO
Packaging & Technology Integrated Solutions
Rob Wallace
Managing Director
Wallace Church, Inc. |
|
Five ideas for sustainable design
Designing a “sustainable” package is daunting,
say those leading the industry’s so-called “green”
movement. The challenge is enormously complex, and it is tempting
to take shortcuts.
If hasty decisions are made, important and costly decisions
can be finalized without weighing each factor involved in
creating a package to meet a host of different needs. On one
hand, the package has to function as an effective sales tool
to meet business objectives. Yet, the materials used must
be suitable either for reuse or being returned naturally to
the earth
Shelf Impact! consulted a variety of packaging professionals
and also sat in on conference presentations to assemble best
practices for where and how to begin an effort toward developing
sustainable package design. There is no one right approach,
but our cross-functional experts agree that any attempt requires
homework and the need to extend a branding strategy rather
than replace it. The following five ideas will help give your
creative team direction.
- Approach sustainable design as an extension of a brand strategy
rather than as a tactical issue.
- Research available material options and understand whether
they work together, and how.
- Adapt current packaging to a more eco-friendly version by
starting modestly and building incrementally.
- Make decisions on packaging materials that reflect the brand
design objective, as Procter & Gamble did with packaging
for its Cover Girl TruBlend makeup.
- Pick a start point and begin the journey.
It is essential to tackle the challenge of sustainable design
holistically and become thoroughly educated on each relevant
factor, says Phil McKiernan, Business Partner at Packaging
& Technology Integrated Solutions. This step is vital
for marketers, who usually lack a packaging background.
“Sustainable packaging development is all about tradeoffs
across the value chain. It’s not just about material
use. It’s about energy use and water use and the triple
bottom line of economic, social, and ecological drivers to
deliver corporate growth,” adds McKiernan, formerly
Packaging Director at Kimberly-Clark who now leads The Essentials
of Sustainable Packaging Workshops, developed by the Sustainable
Packaging Coalition and the Packaging
Association of Canada.
Read the
details about each of the five ideas for sustainable design.
|
 |
INTELLIGENCE ON DESIGN
Put the Triple Bottom Line at the center of your sustainability
agenda
|
No matter where you are or what business you’re in,
you’re getting battered with environmental or green
messages from every information source imaginable. It’s
not going to stop any time soon, either. But maybe that’s
a good thing.
A renewed and refreshed corporate model focused on economic,
social, and environmental principles, often called the Triple
Bottom Line (TBL), is fast becoming the new mainstream business
model. And it’s focused on the right stuff: people,
planet, and profitability. Isn’t that what makes the
world go round? Why not help it go round for generations to
come?
We packaging professionals shouldn’t be too surprised
by all the fuss over sustainability. Think about the real
or perceived packaging crises we’ve weathered in the
past few decades, from litter in the ’60s to oil and
energy in the ’70s to solid waste in the ’90s.
In many ways, these foreshadowed today’s concern about
sustainable packaging.
What makes us such a lightning rod where these issues are
concerned? Why does this happen to the packaging industry
when in fact our contribution to such problems is really very
minor? The answer is fairly simple: It’s because we
are so visible. After all, what doesn’t come in a package?
The packaging sector is a huge target, representing $450 billion
globally.
So whether we like the attention or not, maybe it’s
time to view the sustainability hubbub not as a crisis but
rather as an opportunity. After all, we can make a significant
difference and a positive impact on the future of society.
First we need to get re-educated, beginning with terminology.
Figure 1 identifies more than 20 terms that are a part of
the new lexicon in sustainability and sustainable packaging.
Are you familiar with these?
Once we understand how important TBL has become and that
a working knowledge of the new terminology is essential, we
must adopt a new approach to the package development process.
This new approach should start at the back. We need to think
Cradle-to-Cradle; we need to think Design For the Environment;
we need to think Design for Recovery. By rethinking the process
and significantly elevating TBL in our thought patterns, packaging
will be able to make significant progress, resulting in new
innovations.
Look to see more focus on sustainable packaging in the future
across all parts of the packaging value chain, which, by the
way, is undergoing some significant changes. TBL will be a
key driver in the future. Sustainable packaging will continue
to gain momentum in the coming year by providing wins for
companies, people, and, yes, the planet.
Read more of Mike
Richmond’s thoughts on the Triple Bottom Line.
|
 |
STRATEGICALLY SPEAKING
Next moves in sustainable design
|
I hope you will take a few minutes to read the article on
sustainable design in this issue of Shelf Impact! The
article provides a top-line overview of some of the pointed
and thoughtful discussion on sustainability that has taken
place in 2008—barely scratching the surface on this
important trend.
Shelf Impact! peeked into the mind-sets of companies
both large and small, and found one common message: Whatever
sustainable-related actions you take, understand what makes
your consumers tick. Then, deliver on it with packaging that
stays on-brand and also reduces your carbon footprint over
time.
While traveling around the country this year, I’ve
listened to some pretty sharp people talk about sustainable
packaging. They universally agree that one serious flaw in
current brand thinking is that marketers too often are looking
at green initiatives and innovative product branding separately
when they really should be treating them as two parts of a
whole.
When package-design and sustainability considerations work
independently of each other, the end results often are out
of sync. That further confuses consumers, who already are
on information overload. As a result, brand owners risk greenwashing
consumers in attempts to convince them to believe exaggerated
or untrue claims about their product/packaging footprint.
That path is a recipe for turning off today’s savvy
consumers, who are conditioned to turn a skeptical ear to
advertising claims.
Education—all around—is the operative word here,
and we provide some of it in this issue with Mike Richmond’s
article on sustainable packaging solutions and the Triple
Bottom Line. Brand owners can’t talk to consumers about
what makes their brand authentically eco-friendly unless they
holistically understand it themselves. And any successful
attempt at leveraging sustainable design to its full potential
will require balancing the quantity and quality of packaging
with the energy, transportation, and logistics costs that
are necessary in getting packaged products to market.
With 2009 upon us, a fair number of pessimists remain on
the sidelines in the push for green. To them, sustainability
means brand owners have to spend money for production line
changes and different and sometimes more expensive materials,
while retailers reap the benefits and get to save money. If
the sustainability movement is to gain stronger footing in
these challenging financial times, retailers and brand owners
will need to find more effective ways to work together, along
with the entire value chain, for the common good.

|
Dates set for SI’s 2009 Package Design Workshops
Shelf Impact!’s one-day Package Design Workshops will
return in 2009 with its popular fast-paced, roll-up-your-sleeves
interactive format in an intimate setting.
The 2009 workshop dates are: March 18, San Francisco, CA;
April 23, Atlanta, GA; May 20, Tarrytown, NY; June 17, Chicago,
IL; and Oct. 21, Cincinnati, OH.
The 2008 Package Design Workshops series drew branding, marketing,
and design professionals from companies including Kraft Foods,
Unilever, Microsoft, Energizer Personal Care, Human Genome
Sciences, Sally Beauty Supply, and J.M. Smucker Co., as well
as professionals from design firms and materials suppliers,
and also university-level educators.
Shelf Impact! Editor-in-Chief Jim George and Publisher Jim
Chrzan lead the workshop discussion. They will present the
latest information on trends and best practices in package
decoration, materials, consumer and store insights, managing
the creative process effectively, and sustainability. They
also will invite audience participation to make the workshop
an interactive learning experience. The midday lunch will
feature a guest speaker.
Because these workshops include breakout group discussions,
seating is limited. Workshop price is $425.
For more information and to register, visit www.shelfimpact.com/pdw.
|
Package Gallery
A closer look at the newest trends in today's packaging.
New packs circulate word about Hunter Fan’s
positioning
How does a heritage brand respond to increasing competition
from “me-too” products? Hunter Fan Co.,
Memphis, TN, provides one answer: Appeal to a new generation
of consumers by focusing on the premium qualities of
its brand.
Jim Gallman, Vice President of Brand Marketing for
Hunter Fan, explains. “Consumer research showed
that while baby boomers are loyal Hunter Fan customers
and our brand is strong in the South, Generation Xers
are less familiar with us. Plus, competitors had mimicked
us in many ways.
“We wanted all visual ‘touch points’
to give off cues about Hunter’s long history and
premium position but to also be approachable and appeal
to consumers in a modern sense.”
Hunter Fan updated its logo and packaging in big-box
retail stores to accomplish those objectives, focusing
on the brand’s two central visual cues.
Working with Interbrand,
a branding and design consultancy, Hunter Fan cartons
display a large, elegant script logo bearing the designation
“Since 1886.” This tactic, Gallman says,
pays respect to the brand’s heritage in a classic,
yet modern, way.
Equally important in the on-pack strategy is the new,
close-up photography of the ceiling fan contained in
each carton. Gallman says the close-range photos display
each fan’s finish, the glass type used, and other
high-quality product features.
With these tactics, Hunter Fan reinforces the notion
of a brand offering technologically superior products
to a new generation of consumers.
|
Wine debuts in barrier-coated PET bottles
Consumers seem receptive to wine in packaging beyond
traditional glass bottles. Bag-in-box has become an
acceptable format for some wines, and now barrier-coated
PET bottles are appearing in the wine aisle. Artisan
Wine Co., British Columbia, is introducing to Canadian
markets its Painted Turtle brand Semillion/Chardonnay
and Cabernet/Shiraz wines in 750-mL silicon oxide-coated
PET bottles from Ball
Corp.
The bottles’ FDA-compliant, ultra-thin SIG PLASMAX
SiOx coating is from SIG
Beverages, a div. of SIG Holding AG. It is a transparent,
barrier coating that resists cracking, abrasion, delamination,
and other degradation. Applied to the inside of the
PET bottle by a process called Plasma Impulse Chemical
Vapor Deposition, it helps protect the wine’s
shelf life.
Painted Turtle wines are being sold through the Liquor
Control Board of Ontario and retail for $11.95 (Canadian
dollars).
As Artisan’s Vice President of Operations David
Fallis explains, “The combination of the PET bottle
and a screw-cap closure gives our customers a more convenient,
environmentally friendly wine packaging choice. Because
these PET bottles are approximately one-tenth the weight
of the average glass bottle, they can help reduce greenhouse-gas
emissions throughout the supply chain. In addition,
the PLASMAX barrier coating makes these bottles very
easy to recycle in the existing PET infrastructure.”
|
‘Light-weighting’ takes root in seed pouches
“Light-weighting” is a term packagers are
using to describe new packages that use less or different
material to reduce weight, and by extension, transportation
costs. Here is an example of how it works in lawn-care
products.
Foster Turf Products approached Ampac
Flexibles to create a 24-g flexible pouch for Foster
Patch Perfect coated grass seed that provides a 98%
weight reduction from the brand’s previous 1,400-g
HDPE rigid container. In the process, Foster reduced
the total packaging components from five to one.
From a marketing perspective, the pouch provides consumers
with a die-cut, easy-carry handle and a bigger billboard,
with gloss to enhance graphic impact.
Sal Pellingra, Ampac Flexibles Innovation and Marketing
Director, says 230 of the empty pouches can be stored
or shipped in the same amount of space that would accommodate
12 of the rigid containers.
In addition, a 10,000-unit shipment of empty rigid
containers (in 12-count cartons) would require 834 shipping
cartons. The same quantity shipment of pouches would
require 45 of the same-size cartons. A 10,000-unit shipment
of empty rigid containers would weigh about six times
more than the same quantity shipment of pouches.
Listen to the Podcast.
|
|
|